The comparison tool

Agenda trends

Eight domains, one topic system, seventy-nine years. Because the press, the public, the parties, the president, Congress and the Court are all coded with the same codebook, the share of each one's attention going to a topic can be set directly beside the others. Pick a topic to see where attention to it rose and fell. Start with any two domains set side by side, then step back to the same topic across all eight.

01

Compare two domains for agenda priorities

Party platforms and Public (MIP) — Law and Crime as a share of each domain's agenda. The shaded band is the gap between them.

0%10%20%30%40%50%Party platformsPublic (MIP)19501960197019801990200020102020
02

One topic across every domain

Share of each domain's yearly agenda given to Law and Crime, 1945–2025. Panels run in the friction order the rest of this site uses — the signals arriving first, the authoritative outputs last.

17.1% · 1998MediaInputs1946201635.4% · 1999Public (MIP)Inputs1947202314.5% · 1996Party platformsAgenda & processing1948202427.3% · 1996Presidential speechesAgenda & processing1946202512.9% · 2002Executive ordersAgenda & processing194520259.0% · 2004Congressional hearingsAgenda & processing1946202111.1% · 2013Public lawsOutputs & outcomes1948202246.3% · 2010Supreme CourtOutputs & outcomes194620230%25%50%
03

What is being compared

Eight official US Policy Agendas series, 239,945 coded records in all. Every one is a count of items coded to a major topic, converted to that domain's yearly share — except Gallup's Most Important Problem, which is re-scaled so that its twenty policy topics sum to 100% of policy mentions. The New York Times Index series changes its coding in 2009: Immigration and Culture are not coded before then, so shares for those two topics are not comparable across that date.